MacRumors
Oct 20, 06:12 PM
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif (http://www.macrumors.com/2010/10/20/apple-releases-software-update-for-new-macbook-air-prokit-6-0/)
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/10/20/144119-10mba_fam_front_500.jpg
using mac cosmetics by
mac-cosmetics-love-connection-
MAC Makeup Eye shadow 120
Mac Cosmetics Eyeshadow 120
MAC Makeup Hello Kitty MAC 15
MAC Cosmetics Eyeshadow 24
MAC middot; makeup lot, mac makeup
Mac Cosmetics,Mac 12 Colo…
Pro Mac Makeup eye shadow MAC
MAC Cosmetics eye shadow
mac-cosmetics-makeup-royal-
mac-cosmetics-allages-
Mac-makeup-eye-shadow
Tagged Under : mac eyeshadow
MAC Cosmetics – Yellow/Gold:
MAC Makeup Eye shadow 120
Sell Mac Cosmetics Eyeshadow
double eyeshadow mac cosmetics
http://images.macrumors.com/article/2010/10/20/144119-10mba_fam_front_500.jpg
quigleybc
Oct 26, 02:17 PM
This thing isn't coming out anytime soon...
Macmaniac
Apr 11, 10:47 AM
It looks very nice and this will keep things oragnized! Thanks arn!
Please consider a games forum soon!
Please consider a games forum soon!
SasyBabe
Aug 19, 04:44 PM
I havent gotten my ipod yet.. but i will be soon, so i am trying to upload my CDs on my powerbook in itunes. I was wondering if someone could explain to me what apple lossless is in general terms and how it works? I am still kinda new to Macs so could you explain it fully. I noticed that after I imported my CD, I would go to the advanced menu in itunes and selected convert to apple lossless... it then converted my files. I went into my music folder that holds all my files and i see that i have 2 of everything I converted with apple lossless. The file extentions are the same sooo... what is going on here. I would like to know also if converting my songs to this format will allow me to have more room on my ipod???? What is the positive and negatives of this converting? I just need someone to explain this whole apple lossless idea to me and what it does. Thanx in advanced! ;) :)
rice_web
Sep 29, 01:23 PM
The thread also has a mention that the 1.25GHz G4 is a 7455A processor.
alexpros
Oct 8, 11:00 PM
First of All, I really doubt Tmobile is heading with MAC on the Iphone thing with these bands. The frequencies they are buying have to do with WIMAX. Wimax uses the frequencies 1.5/2.3 and 2.5/5ghz. The say it also has speeds up to 75mbps, range of 30 miles one radio. the purpose of these bands isnt for a phone no way in hell, WiMAX allows you to have VOIP and IPTV, Unless you want to watch tv out of your cellphone. Whats the point in that.
nick.hill
Oct 8, 01:20 PM
I'll be honest in saying if apple brought out a PDA/Phone/Camera thing out I'd walk over glass to get it.
If they do it right they will sell millions, Nokia especially have kind of lost their way with the new N series phones, very buggy :(
With microsoft already having a phone available and the Zune, which may have phone functionality its a must.
At least in Europe most of my friends carry an iPod and phone around with them at all times. The new Sony Eric phone I have now is actually good as a walkman and I;ve thought about stopping carrying the iPod.
So Mr Jobs if u ever read this, pull your finger out and make one! preferably GSM/UMTS :)
If they do it right they will sell millions, Nokia especially have kind of lost their way with the new N series phones, very buggy :(
With microsoft already having a phone available and the Zune, which may have phone functionality its a must.
At least in Europe most of my friends carry an iPod and phone around with them at all times. The new Sony Eric phone I have now is actually good as a walkman and I;ve thought about stopping carrying the iPod.
So Mr Jobs if u ever read this, pull your finger out and make one! preferably GSM/UMTS :)
rainman::|:|
Jul 25, 11:32 PM
Are you sure you have both the system volume and the iTunes volume turned up? That's something that people have problems with frequently (a lot moreso on PC's, which have like 5 volume controls even for basic consumers that get confused by 'em)...
pnw
pnw
jettredmont
Oct 4, 02:59 PM
could be. but honestly i don't think that's a good thing. it just makes the equipment more expensive, clunky and less capable than dedicated devices. after all you don't need that feat all the time. only once in a while and then you bring the extra gps. cramming a gps in nowadays small P&S or even DSLR's is just expensive and complicated.
my two cents.
Every cell phone sold in the US has to have a working GPS device in it, and the GPS has to be "on" at all times.
Cost and power consumption are hardly issues. The only extra cost is adding an interface to the GPS unit to get the latest location data (which might be the front door of the building you're in if you're inside). The only extra power consumption is that needed to initiate and react to that poll, which is negligible (obviously).
But, yes, adding such a feature on a straight digicam or DSLR wouldn't necessarily make much sense. However, compared to the cost of an external GPS, which records "breadcrumbs" constantly (instead of just when you take a picture, because it doesn't know when you take a picture) and has enough memory and battery to hold said breadcrumbs throughout a, say, two-day road trip, integrating a low-power GPS into a camera doesn't sound all that far-fetched. But, I don't see camera makers doing that until GPS-locating of photos shows signs of taking off, which it doesn't, yet.
my two cents.
Every cell phone sold in the US has to have a working GPS device in it, and the GPS has to be "on" at all times.
Cost and power consumption are hardly issues. The only extra cost is adding an interface to the GPS unit to get the latest location data (which might be the front door of the building you're in if you're inside). The only extra power consumption is that needed to initiate and react to that poll, which is negligible (obviously).
But, yes, adding such a feature on a straight digicam or DSLR wouldn't necessarily make much sense. However, compared to the cost of an external GPS, which records "breadcrumbs" constantly (instead of just when you take a picture, because it doesn't know when you take a picture) and has enough memory and battery to hold said breadcrumbs throughout a, say, two-day road trip, integrating a low-power GPS into a camera doesn't sound all that far-fetched. But, I don't see camera makers doing that until GPS-locating of photos shows signs of taking off, which it doesn't, yet.
PedroCst
Apr 18, 04:53 PM
I'm onto my second one on my (almost) 2 year old 3GS. They look and feel great. Got an iPad one from them as well.
Alright. I'm looking in Amazon as we speak.
BTW what about these ones?
http://ifrogz.com/product/IP4GLL
http://ifrogz.com/product/IPHONE3G-LL
Alright. I'm looking in Amazon as we speak.
BTW what about these ones?
http://ifrogz.com/product/IP4GLL
http://ifrogz.com/product/IPHONE3G-LL
SteveAbootman
Mar 23, 07:49 PM
Thank you both for the help -- at this point i've tried just about everything i can think of, including changing channels, and using OpenDNS instead of the Comcast servers. I changed from open/WEP/WPA/WPA2, and saw no change there either.
This is a 3 year old router, so perhaps it's time for an upgrade.... :(
This is a 3 year old router, so perhaps it's time for an upgrade.... :(
rmbrown09
Aug 28, 02:48 PM
15" uMBP?
indeed, see sig
indeed, see sig
spicyapple
Oct 4, 08:41 AM
Introducing Apple Galileo�. :) All-in-one PDA, digital camera, phone and mp3 player.
IJ Reilly
Oct 12, 11:03 AM
I really know that most of the people here are mac fanatics when they actually endorse "Pages". It is the slowest, worst, piece of cr*p Apple ever produced. I have the UB iWork 06 version now and it still sucks!
Not everyone agrees, do they? Many Mac "fanatics" prefer Word. This one prefers Pages.
Not everyone agrees, do they? Many Mac "fanatics" prefer Word. This one prefers Pages.
rendezvouscp
Jan 14, 05:31 PM
For a new Mac owner, it's nothing to worry about. It's not completely normal, but you shouldn't worry about playing with your new iMac.
However, if this continues on, it may not be healthy for you nor your iMac. If you find yourself staying home from work next week just to play with your iMac and Expose, then you've got problems. In that case, I recommend going to AA (if you're in the US) to try to let go, and just use it as a computer. Cold turkey is definitely not the answer, especially with your Mac. Instead, just ease up on the use, and use those functions like Expose when you need them.
Which should just be about every day of your life. ;) :D
-Chase
However, if this continues on, it may not be healthy for you nor your iMac. If you find yourself staying home from work next week just to play with your iMac and Expose, then you've got problems. In that case, I recommend going to AA (if you're in the US) to try to let go, and just use it as a computer. Cold turkey is definitely not the answer, especially with your Mac. Instead, just ease up on the use, and use those functions like Expose when you need them.
Which should just be about every day of your life. ;) :D
-Chase
Mr.PS
Jan 16, 02:45 AM
:( I was hopeing.
samanthas
Sep 25, 03:31 PM
I'm a bit curious what the question, and the answer, was... :p
The question was could I buy a Mac Mini and Apple display at different times and still use AppleCare for the both of them and the answer was no, I could not. So I'm just going to wait or just get a cheaper LCD.
The question was could I buy a Mac Mini and Apple display at different times and still use AppleCare for the both of them and the answer was no, I could not. So I'm just going to wait or just get a cheaper LCD.
4God
Jan 22, 10:24 AM
I expect them at either NAB in April or WWDC. I imagine they will be MUCH thinner than they are now, and will likely have an isight built-in and maybe HDMI. The 24" will probably replace the 23." Outside of that I do not expect much from Apple in the display department. Should be interesting to see if Apple goes with the Glossy Displays (or maybe will make both and give customers an option).
If I were a betting man, I'd bet on new displays (or at least a price drop) at NAB. ;)
If I were a betting man, I'd bet on new displays (or at least a price drop) at NAB. ;)
simsaladimbamba
Mar 2, 12:21 AM
May this help?
How to: Connect a MacBook, MacBook Air, or MacBook Pro to a TV (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=792106)
How to: Connect a MacBook, MacBook Air, or MacBook Pro to a TV (http://forums.macrumors.com/showthread.php?t=792106)
decksnap
Oct 24, 10:42 PM
There is no reason that internet images can't scale right along with everything else. Just because something is bitmapped doesn't mean it can't scale nicely. There are a million decent algorythms for scaling bitmapped images.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Yeah I don't think so. Unless you scale it to an exact multiple, it's going to look like crap.
Chundles
Oct 8, 12:06 PM
Heres the thing the new wireless spectrum actually is WiMax, to those who don't know what WiMax is, pretty much some people say its WIFI on steroids. Also the fact that if Tmobile is talking to apple it may have to do not only with Iphones but laptops. Wimax works in a way that you can have broadband connections up to 75mbps. So if Tmobile is talking to Apple they are probably going to design a chip or something so that people who buy apple then sign on to Tmobile and will have access to the internet with extremely high speeds anywhere in the US. :) What Tmobile is doing has more to do with Laptops than it would with Phones. Think of it on WiMax you can have IPTV and VOIP running and still surf the net. Not only that Intel and Motorola invested over 1 billion into Clearwire, INTEL IS designing new chips for WIMAX. I dont think this has to do with the Iphones.
Yep, years ago when our 3G network was going in down here they had a big "firesale" on the remaining skerricks of bandwidth. Some upstart internet companies bought it and are making a killing in wireless broadband internet access. It's easier to set up and you can access it all over the city and it's pretty quick too. The companies have limited the download speeds to around 1.5mbps so they can get more people on but that's not too bad when you consider you can be anywhere in the city and have internet access.
Yep, years ago when our 3G network was going in down here they had a big "firesale" on the remaining skerricks of bandwidth. Some upstart internet companies bought it and are making a killing in wireless broadband internet access. It's easier to set up and you can access it all over the city and it's pretty quick too. The companies have limited the download speeds to around 1.5mbps so they can get more people on but that's not too bad when you consider you can be anywhere in the city and have internet access.
rosalindavenue
Dec 22, 08:34 PM
I called a local dealer today about an airport extreme card for my sister; he mentioned in passing that he was charging $130 for an original airport card. (He's also charging $99 for an extreme card apple sells for $79). Knowing mac users, there will be demand for old hardware for years to come; I dont think it will be much of a gamble to hold it for a while.
Applepi
Mar 14, 12:04 AM
My base 13" MBA runs Lion just fine.
RoDe
Jan 21, 09:07 AM
The ACD are way overdue for an overhaul. They are overpriced and the specs are so 2003 ;). Hope they put a FW800 on it and an isight.
lets all pray for new ACD :D
lets all pray for new ACD :D